Ben Moshe’s comment on ‘The ABCD of Young American Jews’.
There are no shortcuts to solving this problem. No matter how one tries to position it, Judaism is prescriptive. It teaches that there are things that one must do, and things that one cannot do; things that are permitted, and things that are off-limits. These constraints do not sit well with a generation that grew up in a multicultural environment, free of social pressures that kept previous generations of Jews in the fold.
As I once heard a Rav say, â€œIn America, every Jew is a Jew by choice.â€ The only way to get excited about Judaism is to have positive role models who instill love and enthusiasm for mitzvot from an early age, or, like many members of this blog, to acquire the taste later in life.
In previous generations (including my own), American Jews who looked for an alternative to the yoke of the mitzvot tried to find it in political and social movements such as support for Israel, Holocaust commeration, rescue of Soviet Jewry, etc. (see reply #2 above).
These binding ties were â€œJewishâ€ because they addressed the plight of fellow Jews and could be presented in the context of Jewishly-rooted concepts such as â€œtikkun olamâ€ or â€œtzedek, tzedek tirdofâ€ or â€œkol Yisrael areivim zeh ba-zehâ€.
Today, Israel is somewhat more secure, the Holocaust is for many found only in movies and in the Diary of Anne Frank (that some read only because it was a school assignment), and the Soviet Union is history.
Although there are still many fellow Jews who need help, todayâ€™s generation tries to define Judaism in the context of causes that are remotely connected to Jewish ideas and to Jewish communities, if at all: Darfur, the environment, homosexual rights, immigrant labor, etc. When there is so little difference between Temple Beth (fill in the blank) and any other â€œsocial justiceâ€ organization, it is no wonder that young American Jews feel little affinity davka to Judaism.