Dedication- I dedicate this post to the URL of this blogsite- BeyondBT. Most simply deconstructed as Beyond Baâ€™al T’shuva. The implied purpose being to transcend the societal constraints and the sometimes suffocating self-perceptions evoked by the term â€œBaâ€™al Tâ€™shuvaâ€. In a wordâ€¦ letâ€™s get past it.
Caveat- This post is intended for those whoâ€™ve been Torah Observant for 5+ years. Its message is not for those who get ruffled when old axioms are challenged. It is for those who long for their earliest heady days of spiritual awakening and who intuit that there may have been a linkage between the passion for Yiddishkeit that characterized that long-ago-far-away time in their lives and their nascent iconoclasm that allowed them to smash the idols of received wisdom and preconceived notions on a regular basis.
Among the ways of Tâ€™shuva is for the returnee â€¦to change his name
– Rambam Laws of Tâ€™shuva 2:4
Iâ€™ve always been a bit of a stickler about semantics. G-d convinced the angels of Adamâ€™s profound wisdom based on his ability to assign names. The name changes of such great figures as Avrohom, Sorah, Yisroel, Binyomin and Yehoshua signaled momentous, historic metaphysical modifications. The bard may have said, â€œWhat’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.â€ but his was not a Torah-informed sensibility. I believe that when the words we use to clothe raw concepts are skewed, wooly or unfocused, our conversations become the communicative equivalents of a fashion faux pas. Kind of like wearing gloves on our feet. At best an unattractive look and at worst a recipe for a pair of really sore feet.
In my estimation the acronyms BT and FFB have done incalculable damage to all parties concerned. Hereâ€™s why: Tâ€™shuva presumes being accountable for ones life and taking responsibility for repairing those parts of our liveâ€™s that we have damaged. What the term â€œBaâ€™al Tâ€™shuvaâ€ has meant historically is a person who had previously been an avaryon AKA a Rosha who had undergone the demanding and rigorous service of Tâ€™shuva until (s)he had â€œmasteredâ€ it to repair all that was broken. Hence the term Baâ€™al Tâ€™shuva = â€œMaster of Repentanceâ€.
According to the classic Torah literature on the subject the engine that drives Tâ€™shuva is sincere, profound and, according to some, lifelong remorse over the sin. In the historical model even the resolution for the future and behavior modification aspects of Avodas HaTâ€™shuva hinges on the depth and intensity of the remorse. Ever tortured by the memory of sin, reminding a historically defined BT of their past sins is considered onoas devorim (insulting and hurtful speech) because it is the verbal equivalent of picking a painful and unsightly scab. According to Rabenu Yonah, the centrality of remorse and taking personal responsibility is also why â€œshameâ€ (#6) and â€œoneâ€™s sin being constantly before himâ€ (#18) are among his twenty fundamental principles of Tâ€™shuva.
While perpetual remorse and shame may not be the way an FFB relates to his/her past it is also not an apt description of how a representative modern-day BT relates to theirs. Nor should it be. How can we regret or be ashamed of choices that we did not make? If our great-grandparents chose to abandon Torah, if we were not afforded the barest rudiments of a Torah education or upbringing, if we were nurtured in a culture that is mostly antithetical to Torah and itâ€™s ideals, in short if we are indeed tinokos shenishbu what, precisely, are we regretting? Is it our natures or our nurtures? How can this be when we were responsible for neither? G-d alone is responsible for the former and He, our parents, teachers and society for the latter. When doing Tâ€™shuva are we supposed to regret and be ashamed of what G-d has done or failed to do or of what WE have done or failed to do? This may be the subliminal message of the Rambam in placing the doctrine of human free will in his Laws of Tâ€™shuva rather than in the Laws of the Fundamentals of the Torah. He may be trying to teach us that Tâ€™shuva= remorse must always be about our own choices and never about HaShemâ€™s providence and his administration of His creation. Far from engaging in a holy Avodah contemporary BTs who place too much emphasis on regret are in fact indulging themselves in a good old-fashioned fist shaking at G-d.
The arithmetic is simple; if pre-observance we were Tinokos Shenishbu but never reshoim, then we canâ€™t be Baâ€™alei Tâ€™shuva in a traditional sense. Of course we can and do modify our thoughts, speech and behavior. We can also regret and DO Tâ€™shuva for those of our youthful indiscretions that we already knew were wrong in spite of our non/anti-Torah upbringing. (I donâ€™t think anyone gets a â€œTinok Shenishbaâ€ pass for shoplifting or harassing homeless people.) But that is hardly unique to non-FFBs. FFBs for the most part do Tâ€™shuva as well (at the very least during Elul and the Yomim Noraim =Days of Awe). Some obsess over Tâ€™shuva and really work hard, smart and effectively at it. But Iâ€™ve yet to meet one who would say that (s)heâ€™s earned the moniker BAâ€™AL Tâ€™shuva. Most FFBs are also fully aware of the beautiful Chazal that â€œEven the completely righteous (tsadikim gâ€™murim) cannot stand in (i.e. attain) the [exalted spiritual] place that the Baâ€™lei Tâ€™shuva stand inâ€. So, for most everyone, to perceive oneself as a BAâ€™AL Tâ€™shuva is at best pretentious and at worst self-delusional. Imagine a fellow fancying himself a Talmid Chochom or even a Gaon having studied only one or two Talmudic tractates or someone practicing halakhic stringency or two considering themselves a Tsadik or a Chosid. When such exaggerated self-assessment is conveyed to others it, unsurprisingly, evokes reactions of skepticism, defensiveness and mockery. These self-perceptions will not earn anyone friends or integration into a society of â€œjust plain folksâ€.
Those who fail to discern the qualitative difference of the pre-Tâ€™shuva states of having been a Rosha and having been born a Tinok Shenishba run the risk of diffusing an even more destructive fallout, one that strikes much closer to home. For many contemporary BTs who fall into this category, having no real sin to regret the focus of the remorse shifts to the putative sinner(s). Conflating the traditional and contemporary concepts of Baâ€™al Tâ€™shuva makes us regret and feel ashamed of people (including ourselves), experiences and friends we have no business feeling ashamed of or about. It leads to tortured relationships with friends and family, to suppressing rather than sublimating our pre-observance education, talents and accomplishments and, worst of all, it causes us to fixate and waste our energies on â€œpassingâ€ as an FFB rather than on becoming an Ehrlicher Yid. To conclude- the mostly inaccurate and hyperbolic appellation, BT, manages the slick semantical and psycho-spiritual trick of being both devastatingly self-deprecating and ridiculously self-aggrandizing.
FFB is hardly a benign word either. The first â€œFâ€ which expands to â€œFrumâ€ is never to be confused with â€œethicalâ€ or â€œspiritualâ€. In itâ€™s contemporary usage Frum has, almost exclusively, come to mean a soulless adherence to the letter of the law and a negation of its spirit. There is an innate putdown in the â€œfrom birthâ€ portion of this acronym as well. It implies that whatever â€œreligionâ€ (but never spirituality) the FFB does have is an accident of birth. Whereas BTs might fancy themselves self-made millionaires FFBs deserve no admiration or respect because, as the name implies, they were born with silver spoons in their mouths. Iâ€™ve actually seen the term retooled on other blogs to â€œFrum by accidentâ€. The fact is that we are all, BT and FFB alike, JFCs =Jews from (matrilineal) conception. No one is frum from birth. Jewishness=the potential for achieving the sanctity of Torah and Mitzvahs, is our bio-spiritual birthright. For want of a better word Frumkeit, i.e. actualizing that potential, is not. Even those born and raised in Bnei Braq, Meah Shearim or Lakewood are endowed with free will and, as Rav Dessler articulates in his famous Treatise on Free-Will, cultivate their relationship with G-d davka by those positive exercises of free will that they were not predisposed to doing by their parents, peer groups and teachers.
Any FFB that considers the term a compliment must have forgotten the Chazal that reveals the underlying meaning of the name of our evil uncle Eisov. According to the Midrash he was named Eisov (alliteratively Osu =done) because he was â€œdoneâ€ and physically complete at birth. On an overt level this means that the newborn Eisov was hirsute and had a full set of teeth. But what it also implies is that he was spiritually/metaphysically finished immediately post-partum. The balance of his life here on earth was an entropic downhill slide toward the grave and represents the dross of his father Yitzchakâ€™s holy middah of being conceived and born in kedusha. An FFB who luxuriates in that name shares more in common with the cartoonish Richie Rich than with any true Oved HaShem. Such FFBs are spiritualityâ€™s snooty and spoiled rich kids and about as attractive and inspiring as the socioeconomic kind. As it is in chronology so must it be in spirituality. Birth is the starting gate not the finish line.
None of this is to say that contemporary BTs have not had to work harder than their FFB compatriots to attain comparable levels of observance. Pain exerted to achieve spiritual gain is the main (but not exclusive) yardstick by which G-d determines reward. I may be overreaching but IMO part of this â€œextra measureâ€ of reward manifests in the incredibly swift strides that BTs make in their Torah Study and Mitzvah observance vis a vis FFBs. BTs are to be admired, respected and celebrated for all the pains they took to become, stay and grow ever more observant. But we run the dangerous risks of hubris and divisiveness when we presume that one group in Jewry has a monopoly on the pain/ gain correspondence or on HaShemâ€™s affections.
Make no mistake there are, in fact, many groups and factions within Jewry and the onus for ending the lingering feelings of otherness and alienation many veteran BTs endure still rests squarely on the shoulders of FFBs. To date FFB culture has done a comparatively superb job of being friendly to their non-observant and BT brethren but not as good a job of actually becoming their friends (or Mechutonim!). That said there are the larger questions and challenges that lie before all groups and factions. Among others: Must BTs forever remain a sub/counterculture in Yiddishkeit? As the Kiruv movement moves into its third generation are we any closer to true integration, equality and unity than we were 40-50 years ago? I believe that positive solutions to these questions will begin with our liberation from the inaccurate, pejorative or pompous labels â€œBTâ€ and â€œFFBâ€ and their attendant warped perceptions. I dream of a Jewry in which terms such as these will be considered unacceptable in polite conversation. How about replacing BT and FFB with â€œlate beginnerâ€ and â€œearly beginnerâ€? â€œObservant from childhoodâ€ and â€œObservant from adulthoodâ€? â€œHaving religiously supportive parentsâ€ and â€œlacking religiously supportive parentsâ€? Or, best of all, how about one single term that aptly describes all of us- Yidden! Perhaps then as in the days of yore at Simchas Bais HaShoayva in the Bais HaMikdosh all factions can join together in the exultant dance singing â€œLucky are those that never sinned and those that did, let them return and be forgiven!â€
First Posted 0n 2/21/2006 with the title: “Crafting a New Nomenclature”