An installment in the series
From the Waters of the Shiloah: Plumbing the Depths of the Izhbitzer School
For series introduction click here.
By Rabbi Dovid Schwartz
You will therefore observe the commandments (Mitzvos), and the irrational statutes (Chukim), and the rational ordinances (Mishpatim), which I command you this day, to fulfill them.
Last Pasuk of Parshas VeEschanan
And it will come to pass that in the end, you will listen to these rational ordinances (Mishpatim), and observe and fulfill these, then HaShem your L-rd shall keep with you the covenant and the compassion, which He swore to your fathers.
First Pasuk in Parshas Ekev
Devarim 7:11-12
The jarring contrast between these two adjacent Pesukim is readily apparent. The first includes the generic catchall term, Mitzvos and the two sub-categories of Chukim and Mishpatim while the latter pasuk lists only Mishpatim.
The Izhbitzer is troubled by this contrast and by the opening word of the Parsha; VeHaya, which Chazal teaches us, is indicative of joy and happiness.
The classically defined difference Mishpatim and Chukim is that the ta’amim, the reasons for the former are readily apparent “had the Torah never been revealed, some human legislator would have instituted these as lawsâ€. Their justness is manifest. Whereas whichever taamim are provided by Chazal and great Torah thinkers for Chukim are of a symbolic or homiletic nature. As brilliant and even compelling as many of these taamim are, they call to mind the parable of the boy who drew the bulls-eyes around the arrows only after they were stuck in the wall. No human legislator would ever have promulgated such laws.
As rational beings we often find Chukim inherently less gishmak= satisfying than Mishpatim. Often, our rational minds question and recoil from Chukim. We fulfill them as religious duties and as expressions of our deep-seated belief that, in the Divine Mind, logical reasons for them do in fact exist. Yet to a lesser or greater degree, when compared to Mishpatim we find them burdensome and onerous.
Just as reading a good music review cannot replicate the experience of seeing and hearing the symphony orchestra play the music, believing that apparently irrational Mitzvos are logical and good for us is no substitute for hearing and understanding that they are, indeed, logical and good for us. Currently unable to actually grasp the reasonableness, goodness and compassion that inhere in the Chukim we bear them as a burden.
The sensibility of the here-and-now world bifurcates the Mitzvos into rational and irrational categories. But in the End of Days HaShem will grant us a new consciousness, more perceptive and nimble minds.
The Izhbitzer reads these two Pesukim not as contradictory but as complimentary. Pasuk 11 speaks of K’lal Yisrael observing and fulfilling all categories of Mitzvos. Pasuk 12 is a yiud= a good tiding of joyous things to come. On “That Day†the plugs in our ears that allowed for bifurcated Mitzvos will be removed. We will hear and understand that Chukim are an illusion, figments of our constrained consciousness, and that ALL the Mitzvos of the Torah are Mishpatim. We will then grasp that the Mishpat, the fairness and justice that informs the Torah in its entirety was to provide the wherewithal for HaShem to bestow favor and goodness upon Israel. On “That Day†when this new “hearingâ€, this expanded consciousness, dawns upon us “then will our mouths be filled with joyous laughter.â€
It is precisely because pasuk 12 mentions only Mishpatim that it begins with the word VeHaya.
Adapted from Mei HaShiloach Volume I Devarim 7:12 page 117and page 118
the links to the Izhbitzer are http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=19936&st=&pgnum=117
http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=19936&st=&pgnum=118
Like resolving G-ds foreknowledge and human free will (another central discussion in Izhbitzer thought) The current inability of the human mind to wrap itself around the conundrum makes it equally impossible to know which of the two options that you propose (or both… or neither) will obtain.
If I had to hazard a guess though I’d say that on a semantical level its probably the latter. What our minds will then understand or enjoy would be deemed non-linear or irrational by the standards set by the current constrained human mind.
OTOH the text of the Mei HaShiloach itself implies the former, i.e. that the ultimate “reason”= ta’am for ALL of the Mitzvos is HaShems love for Israel and His “desire” to provide Israel with the means to attain Divine favor. It’s just that “Ekev”-in the end “Tishmaun” we will hear and understand this i.e. it will become apparent to us.
“But in the End of Days HaShem will grant us a new consciousness, more perceptive and nimble minds.’
Does this mean we’ll have higher level reasoning powers adequate to discern the mishpat behind the apparent chok, or does it mean we’ll be more able to understand by nonrational means?